|
4
Submit a Request for Proposal
Brownfield & Superfund Redevelopment Solutions
Risk
Strategics Redevelopment Solutions™
takes full account of all factors driving cleanup risk and
property development to provide a seamless, integrated analysis
of the solutions needed to eliminate barriers to redevelopment.
We
seek to optimize the productivity of each dollar of cleanup and
construction funding through robust decision analysis. Our
solutions help clients control cost overrun and schedule delay
risk using high-end decision analytics to maximize return on
investment.
The
redevelopment
solutions
framework is based on a coherent system of interrelated
objectives and fundamentals that prescribe the nature, concept,
function, objective and benefits of real estate redevelopment.
While Superfund and brownfield redevelopment projects have
unique attributes, common components of our comprehensive
analytical approach include:
-
Independent
critical evaluation of cost and schedule estimates
-
Quantitative analysis of
cost overrun
and schedule delay risk
-
Institutional
control impact and cost analysis
-
Regulatory impacts
analysis
-
Analysis of zoning
and public fiscal processes
-
Environmental
insurance needs analysis and negotiation services
|
-
Bidding/solicitation advice, pricing analysis and
risk management
-
Pro forma
cash flow statement preparation and analysis
-
Site
selection/disposition strategies
-
Land use and
alternatives analysis
-
Development
phasing analysis and strategies
-
Demand and
absorption forecasting
-
Regional and local
economic analysis
|
Risk Strategics Redevelopment Solutions™
is:
-
Holistic
in that it takes full account of all driving cleanup
risk and property development factors. Traditional
approaches look at only one or two factors at a time or
resort to simplifications that collapse under real world
conditions.
-
A
common measure of risk and property valuation
across
different sites and risk factors. It can be applied to any type
of property and enables us to compare the risks and rewards
across different sites around the country. Traditional
approaches are more limited and rarely even facilitate
comparisons between similar locations or site types.
-
Based
on
sophisticated financial
analytics
to give a manager useful information on the
probabilities associated with a specific return on
investment or potential for cost overrun.
Traditional approaches do not provide comprehensive
indications of profit/loss likelihoods.
-
Able
to aggregate the important
redevelopment valuation and cost overrun risk factors,
taking into account which risk and valuation factors offset
or correlate with each other. Traditional measures do not
allow for sensible aggregation of component redevelopment
factors.
-
Expressed
in the simplest and most easily understood units,
namely, profit or loss. Traditional measures are often
expressed in engineering terms and less transparent units.
4
Submit a Request for Proposal
|
